I haven’t written a review in several months because my blogger account is acting up once more, more violently this time around. And I am very frustrated because it’s summer time here in the beautifully muggy and buggy Los Angeles, and I haven’t been able to write for a very long time...so I haven’t had anything to do in a very long time amidst the last minute grade boosters the teachers have thrown at us in preparation for our long awaited but meager restitution. So, in the meantime I plan to write as much as I can throughout the remainder of my vacation, and in doing so I hope to meet my previous quota of thirty reviews by August 13th. And with SUMMER VACATION in mind, I plan on going to the movies much more frequently and reviewing all the movies I go to see (with my family).
Three films I have in mind to review are, “Monsters University,” “Star Trek: Into Darkness,” and “Man of Steel.” When I started writing for CCT I regularly avoided “current” films because…the blog is called Cult Classic Theater. But since then my film preferences have deviated so drastically from what kind of film the title of my blog suggests I review, that I have decided to keep the title…but throw its meaning “out the window and soaring clumsily into the night. So let’s see how that goes and hope that, whilst reviewing more current films, I won’t be hated so much in the comment’s (like last time.)
“Star Trek:
Into Reboot” is the highly anticipated sequel to “Star Trek: The Exposition.”
This new film in the Star Trek franchise attempts to explore Captain Kirk’s
struggles as a captain, once again, and Spock’s struggle to control his
emotions, once again, and Ahoora’s struggle to maintain a relationship with
Spock, once again. The story is generally the same as the first film, just written
differently. Some people could argue that the last sentence just described how
most sequels work, and they would be right, if the way to write a sequel was to
do it with minimal effort. This isn't really a good sign, especially if you
want people to come to the third installment of the franchise. And “Star Trek:
Into Darkness” couldn't hide the amount of recycling it had done with the first
film no matter how hard Benedict Cumberbatch frowned. However, there was no
other film that “Star Trek: The Lost World” had stolen from than “Star Trek:
The Wrath of Kahn.” I don’t know what J.J Abrams was thinking when he chose to
place so many parallels to these two films. And if you’re one of those fans who
likes to chronologically organize every single Star Trek film, than please
explain how this film AND Wrath of Kahn can both exist at the same time! One
speculation of mine as to why Abrams had this happen was for the massive fan
service! Why else would the second film have Kahn as the villain? But hold on a
second. Let’s talk about Kahn.
Now, it may not seem like it, but I don’t
watch Star Trek all too often. However, I have seen the first episode that Kahn
first appears in, and when Abrams tries to create it, he leaves one (among
other things) astray. In the show Kahn and the rest of his people are
classified as “augmented humans,” which means that they are much stronger and
faster and smarter; essentially better in every way. However, the superior race
that Kahn shows off in the show and movie, are insulted by the more current
film’s interpretation of the character. In “Star Trek: Into Darkness” the only
advantage to human beings that Kahn exploits is being PHYSICALLY better than
Kirk and the rest of his crew. The only threatening aspect about Cumberbatch’s
character was the fact that he could crush Spock’s skull if he wanted to. If
you want to pay homage to a popular character in a franchise, don’t dumb down
his character so that it’s better recognized by others otherwise unfamiliar to
it. You give that character new challenges to face, and if it’s a villain we’re
talking about (which we are) you need to have the hero’s learn new complex
strategies to “dupe” the antagonist in the end.
“Star Trek: Into Reference” was a poor attempt at creating a sequel to follow an otherwise well made first film. I will say that J.J Abrams can make things look pretty, and I will also say that he knows how to make a movie. And with that said, it has become very clear at this point that he did not care as much as he did. There are numerous plot holes, and the Enterprise’s concept of “cold fusion” leaves something to be desired…seriously, did anyone catch that? Cold fusion doesn't reduce temperature; it actually increases it…but whatever. I liked the acting, and I think that every actor had a somewhat solid performance, with the exception of Kirk, who was all over the place with this one. Cumberbatch’s performance was actually really good, and I think because of that he should be in more upcoming movies besides this one. The movie looked really good, like the first one, and I would have liked to see much more planetary exploration from a Star Trek movie instead of for just one scene, although, it is my sad prediction that we will not be seeing anything Star Trek related for a very long time.
7.0/10
“Star Trek: Into Reference” was a poor attempt at creating a sequel to follow an otherwise well made first film. I will say that J.J Abrams can make things look pretty, and I will also say that he knows how to make a movie. And with that said, it has become very clear at this point that he did not care as much as he did. There are numerous plot holes, and the Enterprise’s concept of “cold fusion” leaves something to be desired…seriously, did anyone catch that? Cold fusion doesn't reduce temperature; it actually increases it…but whatever. I liked the acting, and I think that every actor had a somewhat solid performance, with the exception of Kirk, who was all over the place with this one. Cumberbatch’s performance was actually really good, and I think because of that he should be in more upcoming movies besides this one. The movie looked really good, like the first one, and I would have liked to see much more planetary exploration from a Star Trek movie instead of for just one scene, although, it is my sad prediction that we will not be seeing anything Star Trek related for a very long time.
7.0/10
Next Review: Moonrise Kingdom 2012
0 comments:
Post a Comment